Print ISSN:-2395-1354
Online ISSN:-2395-1362
CODEN : IJOSHC
Full Text PDF Share on Facebook Share on Twitter
Review Article
Author Details :
Volume : 10, Issue : 3, Year : 2024
Article Page : 195-207
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijos.2024.032
Abstract
Background: Scarf osteotomy is established for correcting bunionette deformities. Popularity of MIS has challenged whether percutaneous osteotomy has comparable outcomes with fewer complications although head-to-head trials are lacking.
Materials and Methods: All studies demonstrating buniontte reduction via scarf or percutaneous osteotomy between 2000-2023 were collated. Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient reported outcomes was performed. Methodological quality assessment and risk of bias was reviewed. Mean statistical analyses of outcomes and complications were calculated.
Results: 11 small cases series met inclusion: 115 scarf osteotomy vs 170 MIS surgical episodes. All studies demonstrated statistically significant and comparable outcomes. Complications varied between procedures. All studies demonstrated high risk of bias.
Conclusion: Both techniques adequately correct deformity delivering high patient satisfaction. Complication rates are similar although they manifest differently. The results of this study can be used to aid patient selection when considering open scarf or percutaneous 5 metatarsal osteotomy.
Keywords: Tailors bunion, Scarf osteotomy, Outcomes, MIS, 5th MTPJ.
How to cite : Coll C, Beech I, Scarf vs minimally invasive 5 metatarsal osteotomy for the reduction of tailors bunions: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop Surg 2024;10(3):195-207
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.