• Article highlight
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 03-11-2020

Accepted : 30-01-2021

Available online : 06-04-2021



Article Metrics




Downlaod Files

   


Article Access statistics

Viewed: 302

PDF Downloaded: 168


Ganjale: Tips and tricks in interlocking nailing in distal one third humerus shaft and segmental fractures of humerus


Introduction

Humerus fractures are common occurrence in orthopaedic practice. Incidence of fractures is 1-3% of all fractures.1 The mechanism of injury is thought to be axial loading with varus, valgus or rotational forces. Direct trauma as in assault injuries are well known. These fractures have a bimodal incidence, occurring in young adults and elderly people.

These can be encountered due to,

  1. Low energy trauma like domestic trivial fall in elderly associated with osteoporotic bones.

  2. Fall from height.

  3. High velocity trauma (in young adults as in road traffic accidents.

  4. Assault injuries.

Hence the management of humerus fractures must be such that it leads to minimum systemic complications & maximum orthopaedic advantage. It means that early stability and near normal range of motion should be achieved as quickly as possible to prevent further soft tissue trauma to the area and other complications.

Though humerus shaft fractures can be treated conservatively with good results,2 Plating and nailing are main surgical options commonly done and have their respective proponents with no consensus.

Plating is exclusively open surgical procedure where as Nailing is closed technique having advantage of preserving fracture haematoma and soft tissue integrity and avoiding surgical trauma. When the fracture shaft is more distal there is always a dilemma whether to nail or plate. Majority of orthopaedic surgeons find difficulty in performing nailing in distal third shaft fractures of humerus and think it easy to go for open anatomical reduction and do plating.

Objectives

The rationale behind choosing the present study was

  1. To assess the effectiveness of antegrade nailing in distal one third and below distal third level shaft humerus fractures.

  2. To put forth the tips and tricks of interlocking nailing in distal one third and below distal one third level humerus shaft fractures.

  3. To evaluate clinical, radiological and functional outcome after nailing.

Materials and Methods

Prospective study of 27 patients was done. These were having distal third shaft fractures of Humerus with or without polytrauma & with or without co-morbidities. All patients were evaluated medically and cardiac evaluation was done in elderly patients. They were treated with antegrade nailing in a period of five years after approval from institutional ethical committee. All relevant data were collected in a standardised proforma.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Humerus shaft fracture in distal one third and below level.

  2. Segmental fracture shaft humerus.

  3. Communited fracture shaft having short distal segment.

Table 1

Fracture Geometry

Number of Cases

1

Transverse

8

2

Oblique

5

3

Comminuted

5

4

Spiral

3

5

Segmental

6

Total

27

Of the 27 patients, 3 had open wound grade one and grade two compound, 5 had marked obesity, 5 had osteoporosis & 3 had vascular injury. Patients were ranging from 25 to 68 yrs age. Those with fracture humerus with vascular injury were treated on emergency basis by fixation of humerus fracture with antegrade interlocking nail and vascular repair was done by vascular surgeon. These patients recovered uneventfully. Co-morbid condition like Diabetes Obesity Hypertension Osteoporosis cases were also operated after complete medical evaluation.

Operative procedure

Anaesthesia: Regional anaesthesia or general anaesthesia.

Position: Antegrade humerus interlocking nailing is done in supine position on a radioluscent top table with a soft support below scapula and arm on the side to be operated.

Figure 1

Position of arm over softarm support.

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/typeset-prod-media-server/cdbdf262-8730-4caa-94d4-666d98a24509image1.png

Figure 2

Supraspinatus has to be incised sharply along its direction of fibres in one plane. Do not splay the fibres

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/f5e63c76-1be3-48cf-9566-4e3fe79d18ea-uimage.png

Surgical technique

Primary scrubbing of full upper extremity including axilla with free full draping is done.

Primary screening of fractured bone is done under C-arm in AP and Lateral views to see fracture geometry and its displacements and alignment.

  1. Incision: One cm skin incision at greater tuberosity level as seen in C arm Stab incision incising skin subcutaneous tissue and incising along the length of fibres of rotator cuff. Tissue dissection should not be done with artery forceps.

  2. Entry point: is just medial to Greater tuberosity. Entry is made with an cobblers awl with its tip directing parallel to medullary canal. Alternatively a thin guide wire is passed and entry is enlarged with cannulated drill or reamer.

  3. A thin unbeaded guide wire is passed in the medullary canal through the entry made and checked under c arm and confirm the placement in AP and Lateral views. The guide wire is negotiated closely in distal segment under c arm with gentle traction and reduction held in position. The Guide wire should be in centre in AP view and in long axis of shaft humerus in lateral view.

  4. In case of segmental fracture Check that guide wire placement is in the medullary canal in all proximal middle and distal segments under c arm in AP and Lateral views at different steps at fracture levels.

  5. Once the guide wire is in medullary canal, gradual reaming is done with graduated rigid cannulated reamers or flexible reamers over the guide wire to accommodate largest diameter nail in the canal. We reamed one mm larger than the proposed diameter of nail.

  6. Stop reaming at comminution site just push the reamer tip across the fracture site into distal segment and restart reaming

  7. Reaming is done with end cutting and side cutting flexible reamers with fixed head reaming tips.

  8. Reaming is done upto superior border of olecranon fossa to accommodate longest length of nail to have longer working length of the nail for the fracture to be stabilized.

  9. It is safe to ream with rigid cannulated reamers with gentle controlled pressure.

  10. Now a proper sized humerus interlocking nail assembled with jig is passed over guide wire holding the fracture site well reduced in position.

  11. Safe interlocking: Use new sharp tip 2.5 mm k wire. Localize IL hole with a small 2.5 mm K-wire make a mark by gentle hammering on K-wire on to the bone and then drill it into opposite cortex. Do not hammer strongly or you may have a supracondylar fracture making simple things complicated. To avoid IL bolt being lost in surrounding soft tissue, use self retaining screwdriver with a loop of vicryl around head of IL bolt. (Figure 4 and Figure 5)

  12. Distal locking was performed using a freehand technique. Before the distal screw was inserted, the fracture site is compressed by placing an axial load on the elbow. Correct rotation is obtained by pointing the forearm and hand perpendicular to the ceiling.

  13. Check under C arm that Interlocking hole is obliterated by interlocking bolt in AP and lateral views

  14. Proximal interlocking is done through jig

  15. Remove jig assembly and close the wounds. Apply pressure bandage from wrist to arm level to avoid oedema.

  16. Humerus interlocking nails used had a diameter of 6mm, 7mm, and 8 mm in different individuals as per canal diameter could accommodate after proper reaming distal segment. In few of the patients where distal segment was long enough we could double interlock in distal segment for better stability.

  17. Post-operatively a shoulder arm pouch sling is sufficient for support splinting

Figure 3

Unbeaded guide wire tip is used to ream with fixed head flexible or rigid cannulated reamer so we get additional length of distal segment

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/30c3913e-efe2-472b-a403-525c30f4a133-uimage.png

Figure 4

Safe interlocking

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/9f3f48c0-47f9-4ffe-9abc-c5b16a3bd196-uimage.png

Figure 5

Safe interlocking

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/0ccc88ec-02c8-4107-a0e8-5bae26f299e3-uimage.png

Postoperative management

Post operatively parenteral antibiotics were administered for three days and followed by oral antibiotics for further five days. Post-operatively a shoulder arm pouch sling is sufficient for support splinting. Pendular as well as Shoulder abduction exercises were started on second or third post-operative period as per patient tolerance. Elbow flexion extension exercises were started gradually at four to six weeks. Patients were discharged on fourth post-operative day and were advised to follow up on OPD basis for suture removal and then later every six weeks for clinical and radiological assessment till bony union. Wrist and small joints of hand of operated side were encouraged. Oral NSAIDs were prescribed for analgesic effect in post-operative period for 10 days and as and when required thereafter symptomatically. Calcium supplements were given to elderly patients.

Figure 6

Case 1: Short oblique fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/e8ba072d-aba5-41a7-b333-5c5fe9af6e55-uimage.png

Figure 7

Segmental fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/93bacbb3-01ab-4d64-95c3-e9e2cedf3ba6-uimage.png

Figure 8

Comminuted fracture with associated fore arm bone fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/d3c0e8e9-aff1-42ee-b2f3-104391969d5e-uimage.png

Figure 9

Clinical function at elbow

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/fff5f2ff-f4cd-4a10-9357-7ea4266be13a-uimage.png

Figure 10

Short distal segment

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/0a62ae44-e310-4a30-885d-a2194c7f4f96-uimage.png

Figure 11

Segmental fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/65282fc6-3e1c-4200-bfe5-4b57ff7fb56c-uimage.png

Figure 12

Comminuted segmental fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/e0df06f2-b00d-4c7b-a518-ae23fe6b7b26-uimage.png

Figure 13

Follow up full union at 9 months

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/9136b13f-364c-4d7f-87d5-7657ec2101b3-uimage.png

Figure 14

Clinical function at elbow and shoulder

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/df9f03a7-e732-4ad4-97b5-26eb8df8b731-uimage.png

Figure 15

Short distal segment with oblique comminution

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/87f7f041-ac14-4911-be5f-056c9911d75d-uimage.png

Figure 16

Very distal fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/084d148f-0b82-4878-be8f-383f9c5c3118-uimage.png

Figure 17

Very distal fracture

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/3929636c-3b24-4cc1-abb9-8c7b1e768f75-uimage.png

Results

The functional outcome was measured by the “Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand” (DASH) Questionnaire at full recovery with bony union.

The DASH questionnaire has thirty questions the answers of which are graded from one to five points. The functional score is calculated by the formula DASH DISABILITY / Symptom Score = {(sum of n responses) -1} X25 / N Where N = number of responses. The best possible score is 0 and the worst possible score is 100. The functional outcome decreases as the score increases.

DASH scores: 0 - 20 points rated as excellent,

21 – 40 points as good,

41-60 points as fair and ≥ 61 points as poor.

The mean DASH score in the series was 30 (lower the score better the function).

We quantified pain using visual analogue scale with zero being no pain and 10 extreme pain at 10th post operative day and every 6 weekly follow up upto 6 months or till bony union. The VAS score was decreasing at every follow up.

Shoulder and elbow range of motion were recorded. At first follow up (6 weeks) 5 patients had restriction of abduction and flexion of shoulder joint of more than 20°. At 6 months, 23 (82%) patients had full range of shoulder movements and only three (9%) had restriction terminally. However this improved by continuous physiotherapy. Elbow range of movements were started gradually at six weeks as per fracture geometry and rigidity of fixation commination and age and compliance of patient. Patients without comminution responded well with active flexion and extension exercises at elbow. Patients having commented fractures and associated fore arm bone fractures responded slowly to range of movements at elbow because of prolonged splint age and stiffness caused thereby and some pain and intolerance by patient All patients had full range of movements at wrist and fingers.

Radiological evaluation was done at six weekly follow up till complete bony union.

Postoperative evaluation

Healing time- 12 to 16 weeks.

Infection- One case which healed up in 3 weeks later (in compound fracture case.)

Elbow stiffness- 4 patients had stiffness they had bad commination and were splinted for longer period but could be regained by aggressive physiotherapy.

Elbow range of motion- All patients had free and full flexion and extension of elbow. In patients having commination, terminal 10-20* extension motion was restricted.

No radial nerve palsy post operatively after closed interlocking nailing.

Wrist and shoulder movements were free.

Discussion

Due to modern lifestyle changes, the incidence of distal humerus fractures has risen and more so in association with shaft fractures of humerus because of fast world and high velocity trauma occurring in road traffic accidents.

Humerus bone is also known as funny bone. It creates humour to a treating surgeon by its mischievious behaviour responding differently to any given mode of treatment either it be conservative or surgical i.e. Plating or nailing depending upon fracture geometry type of fixation and general health of patient with associated co morbid conditions.

Though open reduction and internal fixation with plate is widely and commonly done and is well accepted procedure, interlocking nailing of humerus has gained popularity now a days for stabilisation of humeral shaft fractures due to its load sharing nature of implant preserving fracture haematoma with minimal surgical insult to soft tissues with rigid fixation and early mobilisation.3, 4

The results of intramedullary interlocking nailing are increasingly encouraging and overscoring the plate osteosynthesis procedure. There is no much significant difference between the two groups in terms of union rate, shoulder function in terms of range of movements due to rotator cuff injury occurring in nailing or any other complications.

The main concern after intramedullary nailing is limitation of range of movements and pain in shoulder which is a myth due to improper tissue handling tissue dissection during skin incision proper entry reaming and nailing occurring during nailing These all can be minimised by sharp stab incision of skin subcutaneous tissue and sharp incision of rotator cuff and taking care of it during nailing procedure. It is been heard and explained in many CMEs and conferences by esteemed nailers of humerus that any injury to rotator cuff less than 10 mm is not a concern, and the nail we pass has a diameter ranging from 6mm 7mm upto 8 mm which is less than 10 mm. The other cause are incomplete embedding of proximal nail tip keeping it proud thus causing pain attrition of rotator cuff, subacromial impingement, prominent interlocking bolt proximally due to incomplete screwing in causing limitation of range of movements of shoulder.

The main part of discussion over here is nailing in distal third shaft fractures of humerus. Interlocking nailing in distal shaft of humerus is challenging procedure.

The different factors are discussed for proper placement of nail reaming and safe interlocking in distal short segment.

Distal third shaft fractures of Humerus can be managed by Interlocking Nailing in selective cases taking proper precautions and following some principles.

Let us see what are the difficulties in interlocking nailing in distal shaft fractures of humerus.

Availability of correct size length and diameter IL nail.

Comminution at fracture site with a piece of bone in the medullary canal.

Short distal segment with comminution and angulation varus / valgus.

Segmental shaft fracture humerus with short distal segment.

Reaming the distal canal segment.

Obese patients with larger arm girth (circumference) with bulky musculature and fat and associated fracture hematoma of arm making distal interlocking difficult. The chances of IL bolt getting lost in soft tissues is maximum which again needs big incision for exploration to retrieve IL bolt.

Fixation with IL nail depends on:

Adequate length of distal segment; At least one inch of bone segment should be available above the IL hole of the nail i.e. IL hole should come at least one inch below the fracture site level.Now a days Humerus interlocking nails improved their designs having two distal interlocking holes for added stability of distal segment. We can double interlock in distal segment if the distal segment is long enough.

Figure 18

The maximum breadth of distal humerus if calculated vertically above olecranon fossa that portion of shaft can be nailed and interlocked; B: Nailable canal

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/a76c2853-ee5c-4304-9280-a7a907755d55-uimage.png

The anatomy of medullary canal varies along the length.

Size and shape of medullary canal of distal segment: The canal diameter is wide in Proximal third, Circular in Middle third shaft and Triangular to flattened in distal third. The nail is circular in cross-section, so due to triangular canal, nail entry in distal canal is difficult. All the more the fracture site gets distracted as we hammer or push the nail forward in distal segment. (Figure 19)

Figure 19
https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/f4349b70-e006-4e4c-9d90-25c2657f140d-uimage.png

Correct size length and diameter IL nail: The more distal the level of fracture the more precise length of IL nail is required, so all sizes of lengths and diameter IL nails should be available intra-operatively on table.

Proper reaming of distal segment: Reaming of distal canal is necessary to convert triangular and flat canal into circular canal for best fitting of nail. By reaming, we get additional length of distal canal for nail and interlocking. If we do not ream the distal canal the fracture site gets distracted as we push the nail in distal segment.(Figure 20)

Figure 20

Reaming distal canal to convert triangular flat canal into circular canal

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/c1690e83-b500-4798-a31a-0b5cc30ddabe/image/bf250ff1-aaaa-42e3-9725-b532c8909eda-uimage.png

Safe interlocking in distal segment: Interlocking in short distal segment must be carefully done. The anterior surface is convex and any attempt to make a hole for interlocking bolt, the drill slips away. So a sharp tip K wire is used to localize and mark the site and then drilled into opposite cortex. The k wire is never hammered as it may cause splintering or comminution in distal segment making things more complicated. Use self retaining screw drivers to hold the screw and interlock. Or a loop of vicryl knot tied to head of interlocking bolt to avoid loosing it in soft tissue. Retrieval of lost bolt in obese thick arm is difficult and may need bigger incision to explore it.

Good assistant anticipating your problems is needed for this delicate precise surgery.

Operative treatment of distal humerus shaft fractures is frequently problematic, as in young patients & high energy trauma poly-trauma and communited fractures is a common entity. While in elderly patients osteoporotic bones or underlying implants create difficulty in management.

Conventional methods like open dynamc compression plating or locked compression plating or anterior bridge plating are routinely done.

Plating causes considerable surgical trauma & impairment of local vascularity which is reflected in high rates of septic complications5, 6 & primary non union. Further plate provides stability from one side only hence in osteoporotic bones it is of less value whereas nail provides intramedullary support.

Mean operative time, and estimated blood loss are lower in the nailing group compared to plating.

Advantages of Humerus interlocking nailing over plating

  1. Closed technique and minimally invasive procedure

  2. In polytrauma patients positioning for posterior plating of distal humerus in lateral position with arm over chest position is impossible so these fractures can be nailed in supine position

  3. As a quick procedure in obese patients, polytrauma, pelvic fractures and pregnancy (2nd and 3rd trimester). When positioning is difficult or not possible for some or the other reason.

  4. Intramedullary implant always scores over surface implant as it acts as internal splint spanning the whole length

  5. Nail being internal splint assists in day to day activities of the patient even if the fracture goes in delayed union in elderly where revision cannot be done for their predisposing co morbid medical conditions

  6. Biological fixation preserves fracture haematoma avoids infection

  7. All segmental humerus shaft fractures can be fixed

  8. Advantageous in osteoporotic bones in elderly

  9. No handling of radial nerve

  10. Rotator cuff injury is not a problem as it is thought of

  11. Good function at shoulder and elbow with good range of motion

  12. No stress risers are seen after nailing as is seen at end of plate fixation or after removal of plate Refracture rate after plate removal is 6.9%.1, 7

  13. Can be done through mini incision cosmetically well accepted.

  14. No residual stiffness or restriction of range of movements after nailing.

  15. Less operative time…less anaesthesia time… less bleeding less morbidity and cosmetically small scar

Shoulder pain and restriction of shoulder movements and risks of delayed union have been suggested as disadvantages of antegrade intramedullary fixation8, 9, 10, 11 Impairment of shoulder function with antegrade interlocking nailing could be due to rotator cuff violation subacromial impingement improper embedding the nail tip proximally. Verdano et al. in a retrospective cohort of 48 patients investigating the clinical and sonographic impact on the rotator cuff (RC) of the use of the anterolateral approach for nailing found no significant clinical/ sonographic impact on the rotator cuff.12 In this series according to Constant–Murley score, shoulder function was good to excellent in 95%.13 Average ASES score was 93.3%. Many recent reports have reported similar shoulder dysfunction rates (rated according to ASES and or Constant–Murley scoring) less than 10% and have recommended medial entry point avoiding the avascular area of the cuff, meticulous surgical dissection, static locking of the nail to prevent backing out and complete embedding of the nail as technical tips to minimize cuff related problems and consequent shoulder dysfunction.14, 15

Conclusion

Distal one third humerus fractures with short segment in those cases where in there is adequate canal to accommodate nail can be very well treated by closed interlocking nail following the tips and tricks with excellent clinical radiological and functional outcome. Nailing is reliable alternative for conventional procedures than extensive open reduction and plating. The rotator cuff injury can be minimised by careful sharp incising and less tissue handling at entry point of nail and proper embedding of nail tip proximally with good rehabilitation post operatively. In comminuted cases elbow mobilisation should be gradual depending on stability of fixation, osteoporosis, age of patients and patient compliance.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Aknowledgement

I thank Dr Pradeep J. Kothadia Senior orthopaedic surgeon Solapur for sharing his cases.

References

1 

AR Spiguel RJ Steffner Humeral shaft fracturesCurr Rev Musculoskelet Med2012531778310.1007/s12178-012-9125-z

2 

A Sarmiento PB Kinman EG Galvin RH Schmitt JG Phillips Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerusJ Bone Joint Surg197759559660110.2106/00004623-197759050-00004

3 

C Garvanos CM Court-Brown JD Heckman MM McQueen WM Ricci PIII Tornetta Humeral shaft fracturesRockwood and Green's Fractures in adults8th editionWolters Kluwer HealthPhiladelphia201512871336

4 

P Langer C T Born Tornetta P III Williams GR Ramsey ML Hunt TR III Intramedullary fixation of humeral shaft fracturesOperative Techniques in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery2011Lippincott Williams & WilkinsPhiladelphia, PA197205

5 

D Heim F Herkert P Hess P Aegazzonf Surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures-the Basel experienceJ Trauma199935222631

6 

J Lin PW Shen SM Hou Complications of Locked Nailing in Humeral Shaft FracturesJ Trauma2003545943910.1097/01.ta.0000032252.57947.47

7 

G Petsatodes D Karataglis P Papadopoulos J Christoforides J Gigis J Pournaras Antegrade interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fracturesJ Orthop Sci2004932475210.1007/s00776-004-0780-9

8 

JR Chapman MB Henley J Agel PJ Benca Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus platesJ Orthop Trauma20001431626

9 

Fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus platesJ Orthop Trauma200014162168

10 

T Flinkkilä P Hyvönen P Siira M Hämäläinen Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: A comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixationArch Orthop Trauma Surg2004124537578

11 

S Raghavendra HP Bhalodiya Internal fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail: A prospective studyIndian J Orthop2007413214810.4103/0019-5413.33685

12 

MA Verdano A Pellegrini P Schiavi L Somenzi G Concari F Ceccarelli Humeral shaft fractures treated with antegrade intramedullary nailing: What are the consequences for the rotator cuff?Int Orthop201337102001710.1007/s00264-013-2007-1

13 

T Flinkkilä P Hyvönen P Siira M Hämäläinen Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: A comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixationArch Orthop Trauma Surg200412453741

14 

M Changulani UK Jain T Keswani Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled studyInt Orthop2007313391510.1007/s00264-006-0200-1

15 

S Tsourvakas C Alexandropoulos I Papachristos G Tsakoumis N Ameridis Treatment of humeral shaft fractures with antegrade intramedullary locking nailMusculoskelet Surg2011953193810.1007/s12306-011-0126-7



jats-html.xsl

© This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License - Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.